DFC

[March 10, 2025] The Central Reserve Bank of Peru (BCRP) launched an evaluation phase on March 10, 2025, for its first digital currency innovation pilot in partnership with Bitel, following a successful trial period that began in 2024. By February 2025, Bitel's BiPay wallet had enrolled 67,000 active users processing an average of 91,000 daily transactions, with S/ 4.2 million in BCRP digital currency in circulation. The three-month pilot aims to assess whether a central bank digital currency (CBDC) can effectively complement cash in regions with low financial inclusion and limited digital payment infrastructure, with the wallet accessible even to users without smartphones through USSD text messaging technology. [Source: BCRP]

According to Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank (ECB) technical preparations for a digital euro, including system architecture and safeguards, are now complete, with further progress now awaiting legislative action from the European Council and European Parliament. [Source: ECB]

Norges Bank has decided not to recommend introducing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) at this time, as Norway's current payment system is already efficient, secure, and stable. The bank examined both retail and wholesale CBDC, but found no immediate need for either variant. However, Norges Bank acknowledges that circumstances may change due to rapid technological advances, tokenization trends, and the potential introduction of a digital euro by the Eurosystem. The bank will continue researching CBDCs and tokenization through experimental testing and international collaboration to ensure it can implement a CBDC if necessary in the future, with a detailed report planned for Q1 2026. [Source: Norges Bank]

The National Bank of Rwanda (NBR) is planning to continue its e-FRW central bank digital currency (CBDC) proof-of-concept work in 2026. It will test technical feasibility, evaluate payment system integration, and develop recommendations for the legal framework prior to the overall technical design phase. These tests are being conducted in partnership with selected financial service providers, and the results will determine NBR’s next steps in the CBDC project. In all phases, consultation with the private sector and policy makers has been, and will be, emphasized. [Source: NBR]

At the Currency Research (November 17-20 Cedi@60 Anniversary Currency Conference I had the honor of moderating a panel on central bank digital currency (CBDC) trust establishment with Jean-Michel Godeffroy (ex-ECB), Roman Hartinger (G+D) and Musa Jimoh (Director of the Payments System Policy Department at the Bank of Nigeria). The whole 30 minute session is worth watching (it starts at around the 4h 58m mark), but Musa's interventions are particularly newsworthy, as he explained why the Nigerian central bank is pivoting away from retail CBDC to wholesale CBDC. Recall that Nigeria is one of only three countries where retail CBDC has recently been fully launched.) He explained how the e-Naira story is not a "rosy" one, and ran through some of the reasons. For starters, commercial banks were not willing to support the new payment instrument that they viewed as competition, and that support was essential for e-Naira success because the banks "owned" the merchants. It didn't help that the banks couldn't charge fees on e-Naira transfers, and the central bank wasn't sharing in any of the platform costs. Also, Nigerians are very much into crypto-asset markets and the e-Naira didn't offer the payments privacy expected of a payment medium. In addition, the central bank has been running a popular instant payment system since 2014, which made the e-Naira rather redundant. [Source: Currency Research]

The IMF published a Fintech Note that examines whether central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) could enhance competition in retail payment markets. The authors analyze CBDC's potential competitive impact through four channels: pricing discipline, service quality improvements, market contestability, and financial access expansion. The analysis identifies three market scenarios with varying competitive implications. In unregulated markets dominated by private platforms, CBDC could exert substantial competitive pressure by reducing fees and lowering entry barriers, particularly if interoperability with existing systems is ensured. In markets already subject to regulatory interventions such as interchange fee caps, CBDC would likely have more moderate effects, addressing residual gaps rather than fundamentally altering market dynamics. In jurisdictions with well-functioning public fast payment systems, CBDC would offer primarily incremental benefits, mainly extending access to underserved populations. The Note emphasizes that CBDC's actual competitive impact depends critically on design choices—including fee structures, intermediary participation rules, holding limits, and interoperability requirements—and warns that overly aggressive pricing could crowd out private providers, potentially reducing payment system resilience and diversity. [Source: IMF]