DFC

5260 bookmarks
Custom sorting
Is Wero the Answer to Europe’s Payments Sovereignty Challenge?
Is Wero the Answer to Europe’s Payments Sovereignty Challenge?
FXC Intelligence published a report assessing whether Wero, the European Payments Initiative's account-to-account (A2A) payment scheme, can meaningfully address Europe's perceived payments sovereignty problem. Launched in mid-2024 and backed by a consortium of 16 banks with ECB support, Wero had reached 52 million registered users across Germany, France, and Belgium by March 2026 and signed a memorandum of understanding with the EuroPA Alliance to pursue interoperability with four other national schemes toward a 2027 cross-border target. The piece situates Wero against a landscape where card‑based, non‑European networks dominate retail payments volumes, even as SEPA Instant, TARGET Instant Payment Settlement and national A2A overlays expand. It contends that Wero’s pan‑European wallet, interoperability push via the EuroPA alliance, and merchant partnerships could gradually re‑route intra‑EU and some cross‑border flows onto European‑controlled rails, complementing the prospective digital euro and instant payments regulation. However, entrenched card habits, limited geographic scope, unresolved questions on chargebacks and dispute resolution, and the continued need for globally accepted cards mean Wero addresses only part of the sovereignty problem, leaving open whether it can achieve sufficient scale and network effects to materially rebalance market structure. [FXC]
·fxcintel.com·
Is Wero the Answer to Europe’s Payments Sovereignty Challenge?
Central Bank of Barbados Delays BiMPay Go-Live Date (CBOB)
Central Bank of Barbados Delays BiMPay Go-Live Date (CBOB)
The Central Bank of Barbados (CBOB) announced a revised June 12, 2026 go‑live date for BiMPay, the national instant payment system (IPS), following slower‑than‑planned interoperability testing across nine participating institutions. The Bank asserts core infrastructure readiness but prioritizes institution‑level reliability, setting binding user‑acceptance testing deadlines and ruling out further extensions. The move underscores governance discipline in IPS rollout and leaves open how lagging participants will be managed without disrupting existing Automated Clearing House services. [CBOB]
·centralbank.org.bb·
Central Bank of Barbados Delays BiMPay Go-Live Date (CBOB)
Public vs. Private Payment Platforms: Market Impacts and Optimal Policy (Bank of Canada)
Public vs. Private Payment Platforms: Market Impacts and Optimal Policy (Bank of Canada)
The Bank of Canada published a paper that studies competition between a welfare-maximizing public payment platform (e.g., fast payment system) and a profit-maximizing private platform. It finds that the public system should not simply aim to be as cheap as possible, because if it undercuts the private one too aggressively it can actually reduce the overall benefits from having both systems in the market. When a public system enters, more people and businesses use electronic payments and consumers are generally better off, but private providers tend to respond by putting more of their fees onto merchants. The authors also argue that if the public platform is required to cover its costs but forbids fees on consumers, it must load more of those costs onto merchants via fees, which could then reduce merchant participation, which in turn weakens the value of the platform to consumers and erodes the potential welfare gains from having the public system in the first place. [Bank of Canada]
·bankofcanada.ca·
Public vs. Private Payment Platforms: Market Impacts and Optimal Policy (Bank of Canada)
Emerging Capabilities in Fast Payments: NFC and Offline Payments (World Bank)
Emerging Capabilities in Fast Payments: NFC and Offline Payments (World Bank)

The World Bank published a technical note outlining how fast payment systems (FPS) can incorporate near-field communication (NFC) and offline payment capabilities as “extended” channels and instruments, largely implemented at the payment service provider (PSP) level rather than in central infrastructure. The paper argues that NFC can shift consumer-initiated payments from cards and QR codes toward FPS by providing tap-based, tokenized, real-time credit transfers across payer‑ and payee‑initiated models, while raising device, scheme-rule, and fraud‑management questions. Offline models—deferred, temporary person‑to‑person, and person‑to‑merchant wallets—are positioned as critical for transit, low‑connectivity regions, and inclusion, but they introduce double‑spend, liability, and supervision challenges that require tight limits, secure elements, and explicit policy stances on where offline FPS should remain an exception versus a mainstream channel. [World Bank]

·fastpayments.worldbank.org·
Emerging Capabilities in Fast Payments: NFC and Offline Payments (World Bank)
ID Meets Instant: Enabling Trusted, Inclusive Fast Payments through Digital ID (World Bank)
ID Meets Instant: Enabling Trusted, Inclusive Fast Payments through Digital ID (World Bank)
The World Bank published a paper that presents a conceptual model for integrating digital identity into fast payment systems (FPSs) and introducing new ways to make and receive payments through verifiable credentials. The objective is to explore how interoperability between digital ID and payments can address enduring challenges related to fraud prevention, customer onboarding, authentication, and the seamless integration of identity into transaction flows. The paper highlights how identity-linked credentials can support broader inclusion and functionality. Credentials can be delivered through multiple access channels, including digital ID wallets, interoperable wallets, payment service provider (PSP) applications, QR codes, and single-use tokens, ensuring usability across different devices and connectivity conditions. The model also supports controlled delegation, enabling individuals, businesses, or automated agents to act on behalf of users under clearly defined and auditable rules. The paper situates this framework within international experience, noting that while some jurisdictions have begun linking digital ID and payments, most implementations remain narrowly focused on onboarding and know-your-customer processes. At the same time, the paper recognizes that integrating identity and payments at scale raises significant governance, legal, and operational challenges. Effective implementation requires robust frameworks for consumer protection, data privacy, liability, and institutional coordination, as well as careful attention to user experience and trust. [World Bank]
·openknowledge.worldbank.org·
ID Meets Instant: Enabling Trusted, Inclusive Fast Payments through Digital ID (World Bank)
Ethiopa unveils instant payment system plans (Finextra)
Ethiopa unveils instant payment system plans (Finextra)
Ethiopia National Instant Payment System (EthioPay-IPS) was officially unveiled at the Ethiopia Digital Payment Conference 2.0 in December 2025. When operational, the EthSwitch system, powered by BPC's SmartVista platform, will connect 32 banks, 12 microfinance institutions, and several payment service providers, enabling real-time account-to-account and wallet-to-wallet transfers, QR payments, and recurring payment services across the country. This infrastructure aims to accelerate financial inclusion and digital payment adoption in Ethiopia, where person-to-person transactions have already tripled year-on-year to reach 128 million operations in 2024/2025, while providing merchants and consumers with secure, immediate settlement capabilities for commerce, utilities, taxes, and government fees on a unified national platform. [Finextra]
·finextra.com·
Ethiopa unveils instant payment system plans (Finextra)
The Future of Tokenisation – A Joint Vision from the BOE and FCA for Wholesale Markets (UK FCA)
The Future of Tokenisation – A Joint Vision from the BOE and FCA for Wholesale Markets (UK FCA)
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Bank of England issue a call for input on a joint roadmap to scale tokenisation across U.K. wholesale markets, with responses due 3 July 2026. They seek views on: where tokenisation delivers the highest marginal benefit; whether their proposed regulatory principles and priority areas are appropriate; how far existing rules impede tokenised issuance, trading, and settlement; and where interoperability (domestic and cross‑border) standards matter most for firms. The paper also requests detailed feedback on safeguarding frameworks for specified investment cryptoassets, including how to structure client‑asset protection, legal title, and fungibility when tokenised and non‑tokenised forms coexist. Finally, they ask industry to comment on the proposed sequencing and content of initiatives (Digital Securities Sandbox, prudential alignment, central bank money settlement, DIGIT pilot), and to flag concrete product pipelines or experiments where early supervisory engagement would unlock investment. [UK FCA]
·fca.org.uk·
The Future of Tokenisation – A Joint Vision from the BOE and FCA for Wholesale Markets (UK FCA)
RBA and DFCRC Release Findings From Project Acacia (RBA)
RBA and DFCRC Release Findings From Project Acacia (RBA)
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and Digital Finance Cooperative Research Centre (DFCRC) published a report detailing the findings of Project Acacia, which examined how innovations in digital money and settlement infrastructure could support the development of wholesale tokenized asset markets in Australia. They tested 20 wholesale tokenized asset use cases across fixed income, repos, and managed funds. Atomic settlement, programmability, and composability benefits were demonstrated across asset classes, estimating A$24 billion in annual economic gains. Pilot wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) proved feasible on third-party distributed ledger technology (DLT) platforms but raised governance, finality, and liquidity fragmentation challenges. Real-time gross settlement (RTGS) synchronization mechanisms delivered comparable benefits at lower complexity. Deposit tokens are assessed as more suitable than stablecoins for wholesale settlement given prudential backing, though interbank transferability and deposit insurance scheme coverage require legislative clarification. They identified legal and regulatory uncertainty, coordination gaps, and interoperability as scaling barriers, motivating a post-Acacia program including a digital financial market infrastructure sandbox, expanded deposit token work, and RBA settlement infrastructure consultations. [RBA]
·rba.gov.au·
RBA and DFCRC Release Findings From Project Acacia (RBA)
DTCC Targets Full Launch of Tokenization Service by October (Blockstories)
DTCC Targets Full Launch of Tokenization Service by October (Blockstories)
DTCC will begin live production trades for its tokenization service in July 2026 with a 50‑plus firm working group, targeting full launch by October. Using the ComposerX platform, DTCC will issue onchain “tokenized entitlements” that mirror economic rights in securities held in traditional custody, extending its central securities depository role rather than tokenizing the underlying instruments. Tokens, initially on Canton Network, will be multi‑chain via a mint‑and‑burn model, with no bridges and a single CUSIP-based record to preserve netting and liquidity. DTCC is deliberately avoiding full atomic settlement, arguing current 98% netting efficiency makes immediate migration uneconomic, and is also preparing a Collateral AppChain for 24/7 tokenized collateral management by Q4 2026. https://www.dtcc.com/news/2026/may/04/dtcc-advances-development-of-new-tokenization-service [Blockstories]
·blockstories.io·
DTCC Targets Full Launch of Tokenization Service by October (Blockstories)
DTCC adopts Chainlink as official data infrastructure for Collateral AppChain (Finextra)
DTCC adopts Chainlink as official data infrastructure for Collateral AppChain (Finextra)
DTCC will use Chainlink’s Runtime Environment and data standard as the data and orchestration layer for its Collateral AppChain, a shared distributed-ledger platform for collateral management. The integration is intended to link asset prices, valuations and collateral movements and to automate eligibility, valuation, margining, optimization and settlement workflows across participants, with go-live targeted for Q4 2026. [Finextra]
·finextra.com·
DTCC adopts Chainlink as official data infrastructure for Collateral AppChain (Finextra)
Progressing Fund Tokenisation (UK FCA)
Progressing Fund Tokenisation (UK FCA)
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)sets out final rules and guidance to accelerate tokenisation of authorised funds and introduce an optional “direct to fund” dealing model using issues-and-cancellations accounts instead of manager box dealing. The statement clarifies that on-chain ledgers can be primary books and records, public distributed ledgers and smart contracts are permitted subject to outcome‑based controls, and tokenised units may sit across multiple blockchains within a class. It tightens ring‑fencing around umbrella cash by constraining omnibus issue-and-cancellation accounts under protected cell legislation, while dropping a proposed mandatory client‑money fallback and instead imposing enhanced reconciliation and unattributed‑cash rules. The package signals openness to stablecoins and tokenised gilts for settlement and operations under an interim waiver‑based regime, while deferring full alignment with the new crypto-asset framework and future composable “tokenised portfolio management” models. [UK FCA]
·fca.org.uk·
Progressing Fund Tokenisation (UK FCA)
Launch of POC for digital collateral management using JGBs (JSCC)
Launch of POC for digital collateral management using JGBs (JSCC)
Japan Securities Clearing Corporation (JSCC) will run a proof of concept (POC) with Mizuho, Nomura and Digital Asset to use Japanese government bonds (JGBs) as onchain collateral on the Canton Network, testing whether JGBs can be transferred and managed digitally while retaining their legal status and enabling 24/7, potentially cross-border, real-time collateral transactions under existing Japanese law. The trial, backed by Japan’s Financial Services Agency under its Payment Innovation Project, aims to inform how one of the world’s largest sovereign bond markets could support digital collateral processes without changing current legal and supervisory frameworks, and follows earlier Canton pilots with tokenized US Treasuries and parallel UK experiments with digital gilts in the Bank of England’s Digital Securities Sandbox. [JSCC]
·jpx.co.jp·
Launch of POC for digital collateral management using JGBs (JSCC)
Changes Made for KfW’s Third Blockchain Bond (KfW)
Changes Made for KfW’s Third Blockchain Bond (KfW)
KfW announces that its third blockchain-based crypto security will migrate both registrar and distributed ledger infrastructure mid‑term to stress‑test Germany’s Electronic Securities Act framework under real market conditions. The bond will shift registrar functions from Cashlink to DekaBank and move from the Polygon blockchain to SWIAT/Regulated Layer One, while also switching wholesale payment processing from the Deutsche Bundesbank’s trigger solution at issuance to the Eurosystem’s forthcoming Pontes platform for coupons and redemption. This staged migration aims to generate evidence for scalable, standardized digital capital-market infrastructure in Europe, but leaves open whether secondary-market liquidity and operational risks will prove manageable at scale. [KfW]
·kfw.de·
Changes Made for KfW’s Third Blockchain Bond (KfW)
Tokenization Frameworks: Designs for a New Era (OMFIF)
Tokenization Frameworks: Designs for a New Era (OMFIF)
OMFIF, in partnership with Luxembourg for Finance, argues that the core tokenization policy choice is how to structure legal and market foundations so tokenization’s efficiency gains do not amplify legal and liquidity risks. It distinguishes direct, indirect, and incomplete tokenisation, stressing that only direct structures mainly alter operations, while wrappers and synthetic forms import securitization-style and counterparty risks and can weaken investor protections if entitlements are opaque. And while faster, potentially atomic settlement can cut counterparty and capital charges, fully instant settlement may be undesirable for many investors and instead atomic settlement on demand plus documentation automation may produce the more efficient equilibrium. It notes that tokenized collateral and money market fund units can materially improve intraday liquidity and collateral reuse, but also introduce new run and liquidity-mismatch dynamics and place greater weight on how custodians, depositories, and central securities depositories adapt rather than disappear. [OMFIF]
·omfif.org·
Tokenization Frameworks: Designs for a New Era (OMFIF)
Legal and Regulatory Considerations for Digital Assets (CCAF)
Legal and Regulatory Considerations for Digital Assets (CCAF)
The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) published a report that argues that most digital assets map onto existing legal concepts and that regulation should therefore hinge on underlying rights and functions rather than token form or technology stack. The authors distinguish digital assets that merely represent traditional financial or non‑financial claims from “crypto-assets,” defined as issuer‑less units native to open distributed ledger technology (DLT) systems that perform essential incentive functions and do not themselves embody rights against an issuer. This reframing pushes regulatory perimeter design toward claim‑based and function‑based taxonomies, clarifies when tokenization is simply a new representation of existing instruments, and highlights that property‑law adjustments to accommodate natively digital assets are critical for legal certainty and market development. The central open issue is whether and how different legal traditions will adapt their property and collateral frameworks to accommodate these crypto-assets on a durable basis. (CCAF)
·papers.ssrn.com·
Legal and Regulatory Considerations for Digital Assets (CCAF)
Tokenized Finance (IMF)
Tokenized Finance (IMF)
The IMF's Tobias Adrian argues that tokenization is a structural reconfiguration of financial architecture that shifts trust and risk management from institutions to programmable infrastructures. Tokenization enables atomic, real-time settlement and embedded compliance across money, banking, capital markets, and financial market infrastructures, compressing value chains but also accelerating liquidity dynamics and potential stress transmission. For emerging and developing economies, although tokenization may lower payment and market-access frictions, it heightens risks of volatile capital flows, currency substitution, and fragmented liquidity. The note emphasizes that the long-term success of tokenization depends on anchoring digital finance in public trust through clear policy frameworks and safe settlement assets, robust governance of code, legal certainty, and international coordination. Absent such anchors, tokenization risks amplifying financial instability through speed, concentration, and fragmentation, as contract-based risk management alter the nature of settlement, liquidity, and systemic risk. [IMF]
·imf.org·
Tokenized Finance (IMF)
Faster Settlement May Make For Poorer Markets (Coin Telegraph)
Faster Settlement May Make For Poorer Markets (Coin Telegraph)
Cointelegraph published an article in which Axis CEO Chris Kim argues that pushing settlement from T+1 toward real-time atomic settlement can degrade market quality by eroding netting and capital efficiency. Shorter settlement horizons reduce counterparty and timing risk but require full pre-funding of each trade, constraining leverage and increasing costs for high‑turnover strategies. This dynamic reinforces the centrality of large intermediaries that can coordinate liquidity at scale, reshaping market structure around new “liquidity gatekeepers” and critical coordination infrastructure. Key open questions concern how far policy and design can recover netting benefits in an on-chain, T+0 environment without re-importing systemic risk. [Coin Telegraph]
·cointelegraph.com·
Faster Settlement May Make For Poorer Markets (Coin Telegraph)
SWIFT’s Blockchain-Based Shared Ledger Progresses to MVP (SWIFT)
SWIFT’s Blockchain-Based Shared Ledger Progresses to MVP (SWIFT)
SWIFT announced that its member banks are moving a blockchain-based shared ledger to a minimum viable product (MVP) phase for live cross-border use in 2026. The initiative will use tokenized commercial bank deposits on an Ethereum virtual machine-compatible ledger, operated by Swift as a coordination and validation layer while banks retain control over keys, assets, and settlement through existing real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems and correspondent channels. This design attempts to add a 24/7 digital orchestration layer atop current messaging and standards rather than create a competing rail, aiming to improve liquidity visibility, reconciliation, and interoperability across 11,500 institutions in 200+ jurisdictions. Open questions include regulatory treatment, access rules, and how this model will coexist with central bank digital currency and domestic instant payment schemes. [SWIFT]
·swift.com·
SWIFT’s Blockchain-Based Shared Ledger Progresses to MVP (SWIFT)
Consultation on the Eurosystem's Appia Project (ECB)
Consultation on the Eurosystem's Appia Project (ECB)
The European Central Bank (ECB) published an update to its Appia project aimed at enabling the settlement of distributed ledger technology (DLT) transactions using central bank money (CeBM). Appia is the longer-term initiative to provide tokenized CeBM for DLT-based wholesale markets via a unified settlement ecosystem. The update concerns the launching a formal consultation inviting market and public authorities to comment on Appia’s proposed DLT‑based wholesale ecosystem design and six‑block workplan via a structured questionnaire due 22 April 2026. Feedback will shape standards, governance choices, cross‑border linkages, and prioritization of analytical and practical work toward a 2028 blueprint. [ECB]
·ecb.europa.eu·
Consultation on the Eurosystem's Appia Project (ECB)
ECB Workshop on Pontes Platform Decentralized Programmability (ECB)
ECB Workshop on Pontes Platform Decentralized Programmability (ECB)
The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updates to its Pontes aimed at enabling the settlement of distributed ledger technology (DLT) transactions using central bank money (CeBM). Pontes is the near-term DLT-based interoperability solution linking DLT platforms with TARGET Services so DLT transactions settle in CeBM, using API-based trigger and hash-link mechanisms and dedicated DLT cash wallets funded from TARGET accounts. The update focused on market-developed smart contracts deployed by national central banks on the Eurosystem DLT ("decentralized programmability") that would enable cash-locking for delivery-versus-payment, programmable payments, microtransactions, DLT interoperability, and automated corporate actions. [ECB]
·media.licdn.com·
ECB Workshop on Pontes Platform Decentralized Programmability (ECB)
SEC Approves Nasdaq’s Securities Tokenization Plan (SEC)
SEC Approves Nasdaq’s Securities Tokenization Plan (SEC)

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a Nasdaq rule change allowing certain listed securities to clear and settle in tokenized form via a Depository Trust Company (DTC) tokenization pilot. The order authorizes trading tokenized versions of large-cap equities and major index exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on the same order book, with identical CUSIP, symbol, rights, and execution priority as traditional shares, with tokenization preferences expressed through an order flag and implemented post‑trade by DTC. This embeds distributed-ledger-based entitlements within existing exchange, clearing, and surveillance infrastructures, preserves T+1 settlement, and treats tokenized and traditional shares identically for fees, market data, and audit trail. The SEC frames the decision as technology‑neutral, while leaving broader questions about alternative tokenization models, issuer choice, and future non‑fungible tokenized instruments to subsequent rulemakings. [SEC]

·sec.gov·
SEC Approves Nasdaq’s Securities Tokenization Plan (SEC)
Appia Roadmap for European Tokenized Finance (ECB)
Appia Roadmap for European Tokenized Finance (ECB)
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the Appia roadmap, a strategic workplan to design a tokenized wholesale financial ecosystem in Europe in which central bank money remains the settlement anchor. It will complement its Pontes distributed ledger technology (DLT) settlement solution due to launch in late 2026. Appia will, through structured engagement with market participants and public bodies, generate by 2028 a blueprint for tokenized market infrastructures, including choices between shared versus interconnected DLT networks and associated governance and standard-setting. It seeks to preserve effective monetary policy transmission, safeguard financial stability and payment system functioning, and reduce market fragmentation while enabling smart-contract based innovation in securities and payments. It also has a strategic autonomy dimension, aiming to keep euro-denominated financial market infrastructures competitive and interoperable in a tokenized world. The key open questions concern optimal network configuration, European governance arrangements and how far private infrastructures should rely on central bank money in tokenized form. [ECB]
·ecb.europa.eu·
Appia Roadmap for European Tokenized Finance (ECB)
BNP Paribas Uses Public Blockchain for Money Market Fund (Markets Media)
BNP Paribas Uses Public Blockchain for Money Market Fund (Markets Media)
BNP Paribas Asset Management has issued a tokenized share class of an existing French‑domiciled money market fund on the public Ethereum blockchain using its AssetFoundry platform, but with a permissioned model that restricts holdings and transfers to authorized participants to remain within regulatory requirements. This follows an earlier tokenized money market fund in Luxembourg on a private blockchain and is structured as a one‑off intra‑group pilot in which BNP Paribas Asset Management acts as issuer, Securities Services as transfer agent and wallet/key operator, and AssetFoundry as the tokenization and connectivity layer, allowing the group to test end‑to‑end issuance, transfer agency and public‑chain connectivity while maintaining governance, investor protection and operational robustness. [MarketsMedia]
·marketsmedia.com·
BNP Paribas Uses Public Blockchain for Money Market Fund (Markets Media)
The Case for Collateral Tokenization (ValueExchange)
The Case for Collateral Tokenization (ValueExchange)
The ValueExchange published a report that examines the case for collateral tokenization in capital markets, based on a Q3 2025 survey of 203 market participants across global regions. The findings reveal that firms currently manage an average of USD 74 billion in collateral, with 25% being either excess or non-remunerated overnight—costing approximately USD 2.82 billion per firm annually in lost treasury income. Key challenges include operational complexity across up to 65 locations, settlement delivery issues affecting 69% of respondents, and operational costs comprising up to 57% of transaction costs. The report shows strong optimism for tokenisation, with 94% of firms believing it will increase collateral mobility, 80% of North American firms expecting major impact, and 52% planning to go live by end-2026. Expected benefits include a 13.4% reduction in failed trades, over USD 340 million in immediate savings for tier-one firms, and significant improvements in settlement certainty through instant DVP capabilities. However, progress is hindered by regulatory constraints and legal clarity issues affecting over 50% of firms, though 69% expect these challenges to be resolved within 2-3 years. [ValueExchange]
·media.licdn.com·
The Case for Collateral Tokenization (ValueExchange)
Programming Money Without Programmable Money (FRBNY)
Programming Money Without Programmable Money (FRBNY)
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York published a staff report that examines the distinction between "programmable money" and "programmable payments" in the context of central bank digital currency (CBDC) and tokenized money systems. The authors propose a two-layer framework consisting of an "asset layer" (a ledger recording ownership of plain-vanilla money) and a "program layer" (instructions for conditional transfers), which issues "certificates" that can be classified by two properties: transferability (whether ownership can be transferred) and convertibility (whether the certificate releases basic money when conditions are met). Pure programmable money is defined as transferable but non-convertible certificates that could circulate perpetually without releasing basic money, while pure programmable payments are non-transferable but convertible certificates (like direct debit arrangements). However, programmable money would likely not satisfy the "no questions asked" (NQA) property needed for good money and therefore wouldn't circulate widely as money. [FRBNY]
·newyorkfed.org·
Programming Money Without Programmable Money (FRBNY)
U.S. SEC Statement on Regulatory Treatment of Tokenized Securities (SEC)
U.S. SEC Statement on Regulatory Treatment of Tokenized Securities (SEC)
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) clarified how federal securities laws apply to distributed ledger technology (DLT) based tokenized securities. It outlines two main categories: issuer-sponsored tokenized securities, where companies directly issue securities in tokenized format (with ownership records maintained on-chain, off-chain, or both), and third-party tokenized securities, where unaffiliated parties create tokenized versions through custodial arrangements (like tokenized security entitlements) or synthetic instruments (like linked securities or security-based swaps). The statement emphasizes that the format or recordkeeping method doesn't change how securities laws apply—tokenized securities face the same registration, reporting, and regulatory requirements as traditional securities. It also addresses specific considerations for security-based swaps, including restrictions on sales to non-eligible contract participants, and provides guidance on distinguishing between different types of tokenized instruments based on their economic reality rather than their labels. [Source: U.S. SEC]
·sec.gov·
U.S. SEC Statement on Regulatory Treatment of Tokenized Securities (SEC)
ECB Paves Way for Acceptance of DLT-Based Assets as Eligible Eurosystem Collateral (ECB)
ECB Paves Way for Acceptance of DLT-Based Assets as Eligible Eurosystem Collateral (ECB)
The European Central Bank (ECB) announced that it will accept marketable assets issued using distributed ledger technology (DLT) as eligible collateral for Eurosystem credit operations starting March 30, 2026. These DLT-based assets must meet standard Eurosystem collateral eligibility criteria and be available for settlement in systems compliant with the Central Securities Depository Regulation (CSDR) and reachable via TARGET2-Securities (T2S). The Eurosystem is also launching a work plan to explore whether DLT-native assets not represented in traditional securities settlement systems could become eligible collateral in the future, taking a staggered approach that considers market developments and evolving regulations like the DLT Pilot Regime and Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR). This initiative reflects the ECB's commitment to supporting innovation and technological progress in financial markets while maintaining safety and efficiency standards. [Source: ECB]
·ecb.europa.eu·
ECB Paves Way for Acceptance of DLT-Based Assets as Eligible Eurosystem Collateral (ECB)
When Monetary Innovation Makes Money Obsolete (OMFIF)
When Monetary Innovation Makes Money Obsolete (OMFIF)
The Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF) published an article by Ousmène Mandeng that argues that tokenization and instant financial transactions could make traditional money holdings obsolete. The author explains that money's value stems from transaction frictions—the delays and costs of converting assets into purchasing power. As tokenization enables near-instantaneous, frictionless conversion between interest-bearing securities and money, people would no longer need to hold money balances in advance of payments. Instead, they would convert assets to money just-in-time for transactions and immediately back again, causing money holdings to shrink toward zero while money velocity becomes unbounded. This would fundamentally reshape banking, blurring the lines between banks and investment funds, as money transitions from being a store of value to merely a transient settlement instrument within transaction flows. [Source: OMFIF]
·omfif.org·
When Monetary Innovation Makes Money Obsolete (OMFIF)
SG-FORGE and SWIFT Move Forward in Digital Asset Interoperability (SG-Forge)
SG-FORGE and SWIFT Move Forward in Digital Asset Interoperability (SG-Forge)
Societe Generale-FORGE (SG-FORGE) and SWIFT completed a trial involving the exchange and settlement of tokenized bonds using both fiat and digital currencies. The EUR CoinVertible, a stablecoin issued by SG-FORGE that is compliant with European Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations, was integrated with SWIFT's interoperability capabilities to connect blockchain platforms with traditional payment systems. The initiative demonstrated several market operations including issuance, delivery-versus-payment settlement, coupon payments, and redemption. SG-FORGE provided its open-source Compliance Architecture for Security Tokens (CAST) framework and the EUR CoinVertible stablecoin, which became the first on-chain settlement asset natively compatible with SWIFT's infrastructure. The trial, conducted with participating banks, showed that tokenized bonds can utilize existing payment systems while incorporating ISO 20022 standards. [Source: SG-FORGE]
·sgforge.com·
SG-FORGE and SWIFT Move Forward in Digital Asset Interoperability (SG-Forge)
Interoperability Standards for Digital Assets (MIT/SODA)
Interoperability Standards for Digital Assets (MIT/SODA)
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the Standards Organization for Digital Assets (SODA) published a white paper that addresses the need for global standards to enable tokenized real-world assets to move seamlessly across different blockchain networks and traditional financial systems. The White Paper describes the need to create neutral, open standards through three workstreams: a data model defining asset information, common digital functions for smart contracts, and legal/governance frameworks ensuring regulatory compliance. The paper draws parallels to historical standardization successes like the internet's TCP/IP protocol and shipping containers, arguing that without interoperability standards, tokenization will only deliver isolated efficiencies rather than transforming global finance. Contributors from major institutions including Chainlink, Fireblocks, Wormhole, and others emphasize that true scalability requires standardized approaches to cross-chain transfers, identity verification, compliance, and connectivity with existing financial infrastructure, ultimately enabling the tokenized asset market by 2030 to reach its full potential. [Source: SODA]
·soda-services.com·
Interoperability Standards for Digital Assets (MIT/SODA)