DFC

5260 bookmarks
Custom sorting
Stablecoin Disintermediation (FRBNY)
Stablecoin Disintermediation (FRBNY)
The New York Federal Reserve Bank (FRBNY) published a paper that develops a theory and provides empirical evidence that payment stablecoins disintermediate banks not only by drawing deposits away from traditional institutions but also by transmitting significant liquidity stress to the banks that service stablecoin issuers. Using matched data between on‑chain issuance/redemption activity of a large U.S. dollar stablecoin and Fedwire interbank payments, the authors identify “partner banks” that hold stablecoin deposits and process flows for the issuer. They show that after new partnerships form following the 2023 crypto‑bank failures, these banks experience large, persistent increases in interbank payment volume (about 67%) and in intraday reserve balance volatility tightly linked to daily primary market stablecoin activity, implying that stablecoin-related payments act as frequent liquidity shocks. To manage these shocks, partner banks operate “narrowly,” holding substantially higher reserve balances—roughly 1.5 billion dollars more on average and a much larger reserves‑to‑assets ratio—while their loan share of assets falls by about 14 percentage points relative to similar banks, indicating a crowding‑out of lending capacity. The authors argue that this liquidity channel of disintermediation broadens the ways stablecoins can weaken bank deposit franchises, concentrate reserves in a few institutions, complicate the central bank’s task of gauging system‑wide reserve demand, and potentially propagate or amplify run dynamics from stablecoins to banks during stress events. [FRBNY]
·newyorkfed.org·
Stablecoin Disintermediation (FRBNY)
A Model of Monetary Singleness (BOE)
A Model of Monetary Singleness (BOE)
The Bank of England (BOE) published an analytical framework for studying the singleness of money. It's based on a three-period banking model where banks choose both the unit of account of their debt and whether it can be used as a medium of exchange. The framework suggests that small deviations from singleness may still be consistent with the efficient allocation, consistent with the fact that small deviations from par already arise today (for example, ATM withdrawal fees). However, inefficient equilibria are more likely to occur if the newly introduced forms of digital money are issued by private entities with distinct business models from incumbent financial institutions. The model also highlights the stabilizing roles of both cash and central bank reserves in promoting the singleness of money. Reserves ensure issuers share a consistent asset base, while cash provides a backstop by enabling interoperability through central bank money. [BOE]
·bankofengland.co.uk·
A Model of Monetary Singleness (BOE)
UK FCA Selects 4 Firms to Test Stablecoin Innovation in its Regulatory Sandbox (UK FCA)
UK FCA Selects 4 Firms to Test Stablecoin Innovation in its Regulatory Sandbox (UK FCA)
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has selected four firms—Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, Revolut and VVTX—from 20 applicants to test stablecoin services in its Regulatory Sandbox, focusing mainly on issuance and use cases including payments, wholesale settlement and crypto trading, so that these products can be trialled in real-world conditions with safeguards while FCA specialists provide feedback and refine proposed rules to ensure stablecoins can be trusted for payments, settlement and trading, inform the UK’s final stablecoin regime due later in 2026, and align with the broader crypto regulatory roadmap and related initiatives such as the Digital Securities Sandbox and the new cryptoasset authorisation regime starting from 2026 with full implementation by October 2027. [UK FCA]
·fca.org.uk·
UK FCA Selects 4 Firms to Test Stablecoin Innovation in its Regulatory Sandbox (UK FCA)
U.S. SEC Loosens Broker-Dealer Stablecoin Rules (SEC)
U.S. SEC Loosens Broker-Dealer Stablecoin Rules (SEC)

The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) issued an FAQ relating to the treatment of payment stablecoins under the broker-dealer net capital rule (Exchange Act Rule 15c3-1). A "payment stablecoin" is a USD–denominated stablecoin meeting specific regulatory and reserve criteria that change once the GENIUS Act takes effect. The new treatment sharply reduces how much capital firms must reserve against payment stablecoins—from 100% of their market value to a 2% haircut, effectively treating them like money market instruments with a ready market. [SEC]

·sec.gov·
U.S. SEC Loosens Broker-Dealer Stablecoin Rules (SEC)
PwC 2026 Global Crypto Regulation Report (PWC)
PwC 2026 Global Crypto Regulation Report (PWC)
PwC published the 2026 edition of its Global Crypto Regulation Report 2026 that explores the rapidly evolving regulatory landscape for digital assets, with a particular focus this year on stablecoins – their issuance models, reserve and redemption requirements, and supervisory frameworks – alongside key policy shifts and emerging trends in over 50 jurisdictions. This latest edition examines how policymakers are refining approaches to mitigate risks while enabling responsible innovation across the digital asset ecosystem. [PwC]
·legal.pwc.de·
PwC 2026 Global Crypto Regulation Report (PWC)
Bank of Russia to Conduct Study on the Creation of a Russian Stablecoin (TASS)
Bank of Russia to Conduct Study on the Creation of a Russian Stablecoin (TASS)
Russia's TASS news agency reported that the Bank of Russia plans to conduct a study in 2026 on the feasibility of creating a Russian stablecoin. First Deputy Chairman of the Bank of Russia Vladimir Chistyukhin said "we have plans to conduct a study this year where we will once again assess this situation. Indeed, our traditional position is that this is not allowed, but taking into account the practice of a number of foreign countries, we will once again look at what risks and prospects there are here and bring this up for public discussion". [TASS]
·tass.ru·
Bank of Russia to Conduct Study on the Creation of a Russian Stablecoin (TASS)
Bank Negara Launches Digital Ringgit Pilot Programs (BNM)
Bank Negara Launches Digital Ringgit Pilot Programs (BNM)
Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) announced that its Digital Asset Innovation Hub (DAIH) has onboarded three initiatives in 2026 to test real-world applications of ringgit stablecoins and tokenized deposits, focusing on wholesale payment use cases for domestic and cross-border transactions, including tokenized asset settlement. These initiatives will be conducted in a controlled environment with ecosystem partners, including corporate clients and other regulators, with some exploring Shariah-related considerations. The testing aims to assess monetary and financial stability implications, with BNM planning to provide clearer policy direction on ringgit stablecoins and tokenized deposits by end-2026, potentially integrating with existing wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) work. [BNM]
·bnm.gov.my·
Bank Negara Launches Digital Ringgit Pilot Programs (BNM)
Stablecoins in Retail Payments
Stablecoins in Retail Payments
ArXiv published a paper that systematically compares stablecoin-based payments with traditional card networks as retail payment systems. The authors introduce the CLEAR framework (Cost, Legality, Experience, Architecture, and Reach) to evaluate both systems across five dimensions. Their analysis reveals that while stablecoins offer advantages like continuous settlement, lower rail-level fees, and programmability, they suffer from significant drawbacks including weaker consumer protection (no native chargebacks), higher user-facing complexity (gas fees, wallet management), fragmented interoperability across blockchains, and limited merchant acceptance. Card networks, by contrast, subsidize consumers through interchange fees, provide strong legal recourse mechanisms, and benefit from standardized global infrastructure and network effects. The paper concludes that stablecoins demonstrate conditional advantages in closed-loop environments, cross-border corridors, and high-friction payment contexts (particularly in high-inflation economies), but remain structurally disadvantaged as general-purpose retail payment instruments compared to card networks due to their institutional incompleteness and lack of coordinated governance frameworks.
·arxiv.org·
Stablecoins in Retail Payments
The Hidden Plumbing of Stablecoins: Financial and Technological Risks in the GENIUS Act Era (MIT DCI)
The Hidden Plumbing of Stablecoins: Financial and Technological Risks in the GENIUS Act Era (MIT DCI)
The MIT Digital Currency Initiative (MIT DCI) published a paper evaluates the financial, technological, and regulatory risks facing U.S. dollar stablecoins under the 2025 GENIUS Act. The authors argue that while the Act strengthens reserve asset quality and transparency, it treats stablecoin stability primarily as a balance-sheet problem, leaving critical vulnerabilities unaddressed. Maintaining par-value redemption depends not only on high-quality backing assets but also on the functioning of Treasury and repo markets, broker-dealer balance-sheet capacity, and blockchain operational reliability. The paper identifies three interconnected risk layers: financial risks (including Treasury market fragility and dealer intermediation bottlenecks), technological risks (smart contract bugs, consensus attacks, bridge failures), and regulatory gaps (undefined redemption mechanics, lack of capital requirements, no access to Federal Reserve liquidity facilities). The analysis reveals that even conservatively backed stablecoins could face stress from redemption surges or market disruptions, and that stablecoin issuers have significantly lower capital buffers than commercial banks. The authors conclude that durable stability requires an integrated approach spanning financial-market infrastructure, prudential regulation, and software governance, while highlighting a key policy dilemma: granting stablecoin issuers Fed access could reduce liquidity risk but might disintermediate banks and affect monetary policy transmission. [Source: MIT DCI]
·dci.mit.edu·
The Hidden Plumbing of Stablecoins: Financial and Technological Risks in the GENIUS Act Era (MIT DCI)
Money as a Coordination Device: Some Historical Lessons (BIS)
Money as a Coordination Device: Some Historical Lessons (BIS)
The BIS's Hyun Song Shin examines money's role as a coordination device by drawing parallels between historical systems (like the Bank of Amsterdam's bills of exchange) and modern decentralized cryptocurrencies. The core argument is that decentralized consensus mechanisms face a fundamental tradeoff: achieving true decentralization requires validators to earn sufficient rents to maintain infrastructure, but this necessitates congestion and high transaction fees, which undermines money's essential network effects. As a result, the cryptocurrency ecosystem has become increasingly fragmented across multiple Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchains (Ethereum, Tron, Solana, etc.), with stablecoins now circulating across non-interoperable networks that require bridges or centralized exchanges. Shin concludes that this fragmentation contradicts money's coordination function, raising critical questions for central banks about how to maintain monetary system coherence while interacting with these fragmented stablecoin infrastructures. [Source: BIS]
·bis.org·
Money as a Coordination Device: Some Historical Lessons (BIS)
Stablecoins Beyond The Hype: Lack Of Credit Protection For Holders (Forbes)
Stablecoins Beyond The Hype: Lack Of Credit Protection For Holders (Forbes)
Forbes published an article by Vipin Bharathan that examines critical flaws in the GENIUS Act's stablecoin regulations, particularly regarding credit protection for holders if an issuer becomes insolvent. While the Act claims stablecoin holders would be first in line during bankruptcy with a 14-day payout, legal analysis by Adam Levitin reveals they actually rank fifth as unsecured creditors, behind four types of secured creditors including repo lenders, DIP (Debtor in Possession) lenders, bankruptcy professionals, and set-off claims. The article warns that stablecoins lack FDIC insurance protections that saved bank depositors during crises like SVB's collapse, making them vulnerable during runs when redemptions could trigger a downward spiral in treasury reserve values. As stablecoin issuance grows, their potential failure could threaten financial infrastructure, possibly forcing government intervention despite their private nature—creating a scenario where profits remain private but losses become public, while contradictions in the poorly-drafted legislation will likely be resolved through lengthy bankruptcy litigation rather than the promised rapid payouts. [Source: Forbes]
·forbes.com·
Stablecoins Beyond The Hype: Lack Of Credit Protection For Holders (Forbes)
Universal Launches UAE’s First Central Bank-Registered USD Stablecoin (Universal Digital)
Universal Launches UAE’s First Central Bank-Registered USD Stablecoin (Universal Digital)
[January 29, 2026] Universal Digital Intl Limited become the first Foreign Payment Token Issuer registered by the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), alongside the launch of USDU, the first USD-backed stablecoin to be registered as a Foreign Payment Token under the UAE’s Payment Token Services Regulation. This makes USDU the only compliant USD settlement option for digital assets in the UAE market. The stablecoin is backed 1:1 by reserves held in safeguarded accounts at Emirates NBD and Mashreq, with Mbank providing corporate banking support, and features monthly independent attestation by a global accounting firm. Universal, regulated by Abu Dhabi Global Market's Financial Services Regulatory Authority, is partnering with AECoin, the first licensed UAE Dirham (AED) stablecoin in the UAE, for future AED conversions and with Aquanow for broader institutional distribution, positioning USDU as a bridge between traditional financial systems and the emerging digital asset economy both domestically and internationally. [Source: Universal Digital]
·universal.ae·
Universal Launches UAE’s First Central Bank-Registered USD Stablecoin (Universal Digital)
Talking ’Bout Next Generation (Bank of England)
Talking ’Bout Next Generation (Bank of England)
The Bank of England is leading a major overhaul of the UK's retail payments infrastructure through a new public-private partnership. Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden outlined three key goals: enabling direct account-to-account payments at retailers (bypassing card networks to reduce merchant costs averaging 0.6% per transaction), supporting seamless exchange between traditional bank deposits, tokenized deposits, and regulated stablecoins in a "multi-money" system, and improving cross-border payment speed and cost. The new Retail Payments Infrastructure Board, chaired by the Bank and including industry representatives, will consult on the design in Spring 2026, while a separate industry-led Delivery Company will build the infrastructure. To bridge the gap until the new system is ready, the Bank is encouraging interim private sector innovation through technology labs and a proportionate regulatory approach, aiming to modernize the UK's payment system to match advances seen in countries like India (UPI), Brazil (Pix), and Sweden (Swish).
·bankofengland.co.uk·
Talking ’Bout Next Generation (Bank of England)
Tether Launches USA₮, the Federally Regulated, Dollar-Backed Stablecoin (Tether)
Tether Launches USA₮, the Federally Regulated, Dollar-Backed Stablecoin (Tether)
Tether launched USA₮, a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin specifically designed for the U.S. market under the GENIUS Act framework. Issued by Anchorage Digital Bank (America's first federally regulated stablecoin issuer), USA₮ aims to provide institutions with a compliant digital dollar alternative while Tether's global USD₮ continues operating worldwide. The stablecoin features Cantor Fitzgerald as reserve custodian, bank-grade compliance infrastructure, and is initially available on major exchanges including Bybit, Crypto.com, Kraken, OKX, and Moonpay. This launch represents Tether's effort to strengthen U.S. dollar dominance in the digital economy while meeting American regulatory standards. The press release notes that Tether is the 17th-largest holder of U.S. Treasuries globally, ahead of sovereign holders including Germany, South Korea, and Australia. [Source: Tether]
·tether.io·
Tether Launches USA₮, the Federally Regulated, Dollar-Backed Stablecoin (Tether)
Stablecoins as Eurodollars 2.0 - Toward a Shadow Dollar Standard (SSRN)
Stablecoins as Eurodollars 2.0 - Toward a Shadow Dollar Standard (SSRN)
A paper posted on SSRN co-authored by the University of Toronto's Redouane Elkamhi argues that fiat-backed stablecoins function as "Eurodollars 2.0"—a new generation of offshore dollar liabilities that operate outside traditional banking regulation but remain economically linked to U.S. financial markets through reserve holdings and redemption mechanisms. Like the historical eurodollar system, stablecoins expand dollar liquidity creation and circulation beyond domestic borders, potentially strengthening dollar dominance by embedding the dollar as the default settlement asset in tokenized finance and accelerating digital dollarization in economies with weak currencies. However, this creates similar fragilities: stablecoins can experience rapid redemption runs that force reserve liquidations and transmit stress to money markets, while their global accessibility may erode monetary sovereignty in other jurisdictions. The authors propose the "Stablecoin Eurodollar System" framework to analyze how stress propagates through on-chain payment layers, off-chain reserve portfolios, and wholesale funding markets, emphasizing that the key policy challenge is not whether stablecoins exist but how convertibility into state money is governed when usage becomes systemic—particularly regarding reserve requirements, transparency standards, and whether public sector liquidity backstops should be extended to this new class of dollar instruments. [Source: SSRN]
·papers.ssrn.com·
Stablecoins as Eurodollars 2.0 - Toward a Shadow Dollar Standard (SSRN)
Stablecoins Are the Future But Banks Will Survive (Bloomberg)
Stablecoins Are the Future But Banks Will Survive (Bloomberg)
Bloomberg published an article that argues that stablecoins pose minimal threat to traditional banking. While banks worry that interest-bearing stablecoins will drain deposits and increase their funding costs, the article contends that historical evidence suggests stablecoins and bank deposits serve complementary rather than competing functions—similar to how bank notes and deposits coexisted during the National Banking Era. The authors note that 70-80% of bank deposits are insensitive to interest rates, with customers valuing bundled services like physical branches over higher yields, making mass migration to stablecoins unlikely. They conclude that stablecoins, backed strictly by cash and short-term Treasuries under the GENIUS Act, enhance financial stability rather than threaten it, while providing additional demand for government debt. [Source: Bloomberg]
·bloomberg.com·
Stablecoins Are the Future But Banks Will Survive (Bloomberg)
Stablecoins in Payments: What the Raw Transaction Numbers Miss (LinkedIn)
Stablecoins in Payments: What the Raw Transaction Numbers Miss (LinkedIn)
McKinsey Financial Services published analysis reveals that while stablecoins show headline transaction volumes of up to $35 trillion annually, the actual payment activity is only about $390 billion—representing roughly 0.02% of global payments. Most reported stablecoin transactions consist of trading, internal fund shuffling, and automated blockchain activity rather than real-world payments like supplier payments or remittances. The research, conducted with Artemis Analytics, found that B2B payments dominate actual stablecoin usage at $226 billion (60% of total), with Asia-originated activity leading at $245 billion. While stablecoin supply has grown from under $30 billion in 2020 to over $300 billion today, with projections reaching $2-4 trillion by 2030, the analysis emphasizes that financial institutions need to critically evaluate raw blockchain data and invest strategically in proven use cases rather than relying on inflated volume figures to assess stablecoins' current market position and potential. [Source: McKinsey]
·linkedin.com·
Stablecoins in Payments: What the Raw Transaction Numbers Miss (LinkedIn)
Liquidity, Redemptions, and Fire Sales with a Systemic Stablecoin (IMF)
Liquidity, Redemptions, and Fire Sales with a Systemic Stablecoin (IMF)
The IMF published a paper that examines the financial stability risks posed by systemically important fiat-backed stablecoins and explores regulatory design choices to mitigate them. The authors argue that if stablecoins scale to systemic size, they could create dangerous feedback loops: redemptions would force bond sales, depressing market prices and yields, which would erode the issuer's solvency and trigger further redemptions—amplifying stress across financial markets. Through both conceptual analysis and a simulation model, the paper demonstrates that capital requirements (maintaining asset-liability ratios above 100%) and cash reserve requirements are the most effective stabilizers, substantially reducing the likelihood and severity of runs and fire sales. Redemption gates and lower-duration bond portfolios provide additional but more modest protection by moderating intensity rather than frequency of crises. However, in any case, the paper concludes that international regulatory coordination will be essential to prevent arbitrage. [Source: IMF]
·imf.org·
Liquidity, Redemptions, and Fire Sales with a Systemic Stablecoin (IMF)
Wyoming Debuts First State-Issued Stable Token (Markets Media)
Wyoming Debuts First State-Issued Stable Token (Markets Media)
Wyoming has launched the Frontier Stable Token ($FRNT), marking the first state-issued stablecoin in the United States. Reserves will be held in trust by Wyoming and invested exclusively in U.S. dollars and short-duration U.S. Treasuries, managed by Franklin Templeton. The token is available for purchase on Kraken (Solana blockchain) and Rain (Avalanche blockchain), utilizing LayerZero for cross-chain interoperability and Fireblocks for security. [Source: Markets Media]
·marketsmedia.com·
Wyoming Debuts First State-Issued Stable Token (Markets Media)
A Framework for Understanding the Vulnerabilities of New Money-Like Products (FRB)
A Framework for Understanding the Vulnerabilities of New Money-Like Products (FRB)
The Federal Reserve (FRB) published a paper that introduces a framework for analyzing vulnerabilities in new money-like products by comparing them to money market funds (MMFs), which have well-documented risks. The authors examine five key features that contribute to vulnerabilities: liquidity transformation, threshold effects, moneyness (perceived safety and liquidity), contagion risks, and reactive investors. They apply this framework to three emerging products: money market ETFs (MMETFs), tokenized MMFs, and stablecoins. The analysis finds that MMETFs have similar liquidity transformation to MMFs but reduced threshold effects due to market pricing; tokenized MMFs largely mirror their underlying MMF vulnerabilities but could become more money-like if token transfers can effect ownership changes; and stablecoins present mixed risks, with the 2025 GENIUS Act likely to standardize payment stablecoins and align them more closely with MMF characteristics. The framework emphasizes that vulnerabilities arise from combinations of these features rather than individual attributes, and that as these novel products evolve and become more familiar to investors, their non-structural features—particularly their perceived moneyness and investor base composition—will likely shift significantly. [Source: FRB]
·federalreserve.gov·
A Framework for Understanding the Vulnerabilities of New Money-Like Products (FRB)
RAKBANK Receives In-Principle Approval to Launch a Dirham-Backed Stablecoin (RAKBANK)
RAKBANK Receives In-Principle Approval to Launch a Dirham-Backed Stablecoin (RAKBANK)
RAKBANK became the latest United Arab Emirates (UAE) bank to received in‑principle approval from the central bank to issue a fully reserved, 1:1 Dirham-backed stablecoin. Al Maryah Community Bank secured in-principle approval in October 2024, and full licensing in December 2024 for its AE Coin, and Zand (an "AI-powered bank) received full approval in November 2025 for its Zand AED stablecoin. The Central Bank of the UAE’s Payment Token Services Regulation restricts payment tokens to Dirham-backed or specifically approved fiat-referenced stablecoins for onshore payments, effectively steering merchant crypto acceptance toward Dirham stablecoins. In parallel, Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority has finalized Version 2.0 of its activity-based rulebooks, including requirements for fiat‑referenced stablecoins issued by Dubai‑incorporated virtual asset service providers, creating a distinct but complementary regime for Dubai and its free zones. [Source: RAKBANK]
·zawya.com·
RAKBANK Receives In-Principle Approval to Launch a Dirham-Backed Stablecoin (RAKBANK)
Stablecoin Remittance Inflows versus Government Macroeconomic Policy (LinkedIn)
Stablecoin Remittance Inflows versus Government Macroeconomic Policy (LinkedIn)
In a LinkedIn post Tarique Khan argues that stablecoin policy debates overlook a fundamental macroeconomic tension: while stablecoins may offer operational efficiencies in cross-border payments, they risk undermining foreign exchange reserve accumulation in countries dependent on remittance inflows. Khan uses Bangladesh's 2.5% incentive for formal remittance channels as evidence that central banks already compete against informal transfer networks (hundi, hawala, padala) that keep hard currency offshore. Stablecoins potentially accelerate this problem—a migrant worker can purchase USDC abroad and transfer it for peer-to-peer conversion locally, satisfying the household recipient while bypassing the regulated banking system entirely. However, a key refinement to this analysis suggests the reserve leakage mechanism depends primarily on where conversion occurs rather than on stablecoins themselves: if regulated banks or payment institutions control the on/off-ramps, the same technology could channel foreign exchange into official reserves more efficiently rather than divert it offshore. This reframes the policy question from technology adoption to institutional control over conversion, custody, and settlement infrastructure. The divergent regulatory approaches across jurisdictions reflect these varying concerns: remittance-dependent economies (Bangladesh, Philippines, Mexico) prioritize maintaining visible inflows; strict capital control regimes (China) focus on preventing unregulated movement; high-inflation economies (Turkey, Argentina) may tolerate stablecoins as inflation hedges. The central challenge remains reconciling stablecoins' operational advantages with governments' need to maintain reserve buffers and monetary policy levers—though whether regulatory capture of conversion points is economically sustainable against decentralized alternatives, and whether centralized intermediation negates the purported efficiency gains, requires further examination. [Source: LinkedIn]
·linkedin.com·
Stablecoin Remittance Inflows versus Government Macroeconomic Policy (LinkedIn)
Lessons from the SVB Failure and Its Impact on Stablecoins (FRB)
Lessons from the SVB Failure and Its Impact on Stablecoins (FRB)
The Federal Reserve (FRB) published a paper that examines how the March 2023 Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) failure triggered a crisis in the stablecoin market, particularly affecting USDC, the second-largest stablecoin. When Circle (USDC's issuer) announced it couldn't access $3.3 billion in reserves held at the failed SVB, USDC lost its dollar peg and dropped to 86 cents as redemption requests surged and primary market operations shut down over the weekend. The crisis spread through DeFi via automated smart contracts called Peg Stability Modules (PSMs), which allowed one-to-one exchanges between USDC and other stablecoins like Dai, USDP, and GUSD—causing these otherwise unaffected stablecoins to also lose their pegs. The situation stabilized only after federal authorities announced full protection for all SVB depositors. The paper highlights three key lessons: the potential for two-way contagion between traditional finance and crypto markets, the fragility of stablecoins even with high-quality backing assets during stress periods, and how automated smart contracts can create dangerous interlinkages that amplify systemic risk across the DeFi ecosystem. [Source: FRB]
·federalreserve.gov·
Lessons from the SVB Failure and Its Impact on Stablecoins (FRB)
Stablecoin Devaluation Risk (European Journal of Finance)
Stablecoin Devaluation Risk (European Journal of Finance)
A paper co-authored by Barry Eichengreen published in the European Journal of Finance (EJF) contends that reliance of stablecoin issuers on centralized custodians introduces devaluation risk similar to that observed in traditional currencies under pegged exchange rate regimes. The authors construct market-based measures of stablecoin devaluation risk using spot and futures prices for Tether. Conditional on full default, their estimates suggest an average devaluation probability of 60 basis points annually, rising to over 200 basis points during the 2022 Terra-Luna crash. In contrast, the probability of a partial default, defined as a 5% devaluation (trading at 95 cents), is approximately 12 percentage points on an annualized basis. Key risk factors include market volatility and transaction velocity. While elevated interest rates suggest heightened devaluation risk, deviations from covered interest parity indicate segmentation between traditional and stablecoin markets, reflecting the effects of leverage trading and arbitrage costs. To mitigate these risks, their findings suggest the importance of greater transparency and regulatory oversight. For example, the authors suggest implementing proof-of-reserve systems powered by smart contracts which would allow new tokens to be minted only when verified reserve balances increase, providing real-time detection of custodial issues rather than relying on quarterly attestations. [Source: EJF]
·tandfonline.com·
Stablecoin Devaluation Risk (European Journal of Finance)
Stablecoin Devaluation Risk (European Journal of Finance)
Stablecoin Devaluation Risk (European Journal of Finance)
A paper co-authored by Barry Eichengreen published in the European Journal of Finance (EJF) contends that reliance of stablecoin issuers on centralized custodians introduces devaluation risk similar to that observed in traditional currencies under pegged exchange rate regimes. The authors construct market-based measures of stablecoin devaluation risk using spot and futures prices for Tether. Conditional on full default, their estimates suggest an average devaluation probability of 60 basis points annually, rising to over 200 basis points during the 2022 Terra-Luna crash. In contrast, the probability of a partial default, defined as a 5% devaluation (trading at 95 cents), is approximately 12 percentage points on an annualized basis. Key risk factors include market volatility and transaction velocity. While elevated interest rates suggest heightened devaluation risk, deviations from covered interest parity indicate segmentation between traditional and stablecoin markets, reflecting the effects of leverage trading and arbitrage costs. To mitigate these risks, their findings suggest the importance of greater transparency and regulatory oversight. For example, the authors suggest implementing proof-of-reserve systems powered by smart contracts which would allow new tokens to be minted only when verified reserve balances increase, providing real-time detection of custodial issues rather than relying on quarterly attestations. [Source: EJF]
·tandfonline.com·
Stablecoin Devaluation Risk (European Journal of Finance)
How New Regulations May Impact the Future of Stablecoins (CBPN)
How New Regulations May Impact the Future of Stablecoins (CBPN)
Central Bank Payments News (CBPN) published an article by Zeke Copic that examines how new stablecoin regulations in the U.S. (GENIUS Act) and EU (MiCA) may impact the business models of stablecoin issuers. Both regulatory frameworks require 1:1 backing with high-quality liquid assets and prohibit interest payments to holders, but differ in prescribed asset allocations—the EU mandates 30-60% in bank deposits while the U.S. sets no specific limits. The analysis shows that while stablecoin issuers like Circle currently generate 95-99% of revenue from interest on reserve assets (primarily Treasury bills and reverse repos), they face significant interest rate risk as rates are expected to decline. However, projected growth in stablecoin supply to $1.4 trillion by 2030 could offset revenue losses from lower rates, resulting in modest revenue increases. The article concludes that Europe's more prescriptive MiCA regulations may hinder stablecoin growth compared to the U.S. approach, and issuers may need to develop alternative revenue sources beyond reserve asset yields to maintain viable business models. [Source: CBPN]
·cbpn.currencyresearch.com·
How New Regulations May Impact the Future of Stablecoins (CBPN)
An Empirical Analysis of Stablecoin Payment Usage on Ethereum (Artemis Analytics)
An Empirical Analysis of Stablecoin Payment Usage on Ethereum (Artemis Analytics)
Artemis Analytics published an examination of stablecoin usage for payments on Ethereum by analyzing USDT and USDC transactions from August 2024 to August 2025. The authors employ a filtering methodology that distinguishes between externally-owned account (EOA) to EOA transfers, classified as payments, and smart contract interactions, primarily DeFi activity. Using wallet metadata to categorize transactions as person-to-person, business-to-business, or person-to-business transfers, they find that payments constitute approximately 47% of total stablecoin volume (or 35% excluding internal business transfers). While P2P transactions represent 67% of payment transaction counts, they account for only 24% of payment volume, suggesting retail transfers are substantially smaller than institutional flows. The analysis reveals considerable concentration, with the top 1,000 wallets contributing roughly 84% of transaction volume. The authors acknowledge methodological limitations, including potential misclassification of transactions and the inability to capture payments routed through intermediaries. Their estimates should be considered upper bounds given the relatively permissive criteria for classifying transactions as payments. [Source: Artemis Analytics]
An Empirical Analysis of Stablecoin Payment Usage on Ethereum
·artemisanalytics.com·
An Empirical Analysis of Stablecoin Payment Usage on Ethereum (Artemis Analytics)
U.S. Banks in the Age of Stablecoins: Some Possible Implications for Deposits, Credit, and Financial Intermediation (FRB)
U.S. Banks in the Age of Stablecoins: Some Possible Implications for Deposits, Credit, and Financial Intermediation (FRB)
The U.S. Federal Reserve (FRB) published a paper that examines how the growth of stablecoins could reshape traditional banking across three key dimensions. First, stablecoin adoption may displace bank deposits, though the net effect depends on whether issuers hold reserves as bank deposits (which would maintain system size but shift composition toward volatile wholesale deposits) or in other assets like Treasury bills. The impact also depends critically on Federal Reserve Bank master account access: if issuers have no access, they remain dependent on banks; if they gain limited purpose "skinny" master accounts, they can bypass banks for payment settlement while keeping some deposits out of the system; but if they receive full interest-paying master accounts, they could bypass banks entirely, creating maximum disintermediation. Second, deposit outflows could significantly constrain bank lending, with empirical estimates suggesting each $100 billion in net deposit drain could reduce lending by $60-126 billion, with effects varying by bank size and disproportionately impacting small businesses and commercial real estate borrowers. Third, stablecoins could fundamentally alter banks' role in payments and accelerate the unbundling of traditional banking services. [Source: FRB]
·federalreserve.gov·
U.S. Banks in the Age of Stablecoins: Some Possible Implications for Deposits, Credit, and Financial Intermediation (FRB)
Stablecoins and Banking: Deposit Dynamics, Financial Stability, andRegulatory Design (Cornell University)
Stablecoins and Banking: Deposit Dynamics, Financial Stability, andRegulatory Design (Cornell University)
A paper by Lin William Cong examines the impact of regulated stablecoins on banking and financial stability under the GENIUS Act framework. He argues that, contrary to popular concerns about deposit erosion and systemic risk, well-regulated stablecoins backed by high-quality liquid assets are more likely to complement rather than disrupt traditional banking. Using theoretical models and empirical evidence, Cong demonstrates that under realistic yield environments consistent with the GENIUS Act's requirements (full reserve backing, enforceable redemption rights, and transparent disclosures) stablecoins may actually enhance competition, encourage more efficient deposit pricing, and improve payment infrastructure. The analysis suggests that stablecoins can strengthen safe-asset markets, reduce settlement risk through on-chain transactions, and provide banks with strategic opportunities through custody services and tokenized assets. While acknowledging residual risks similar to those in traditional finance, he concludes that with prudent oversight and clear regulatory standards, stablecoins can serve as a durable payment instrument that advances financial system efficiency, inclusion, and stability. [Source: Cornell University]
·cornell.app.box.com·
Stablecoins and Banking: Deposit Dynamics, Financial Stability, andRegulatory Design (Cornell University)
VISA Launches Stablecoin Settlement in the United States (VISA)
VISA Launches Stablecoin Settlement in the United States (VISA)
VISA has launched USDC stablecoin settlement in the United States, allowing U.S. issuer and acquirer partners to settle transactions using Circle's USDC for the first time. The initiative offers benefits including faster funds movement via blockchain, seven-day availability, and enhanced operational resilience during weekends and holidays. Initial U.S. banking participants include Cross River Bank and Lead Bank, which are settling with Visa using USDC over the Solana blockchain, with broader U.S. availability planned through 2026. This marks a significant expansion of VISA's stablecoin settlement pilot program that has been operating in other regions since 2023, and the company is also partnering with Circle on Arc, a new Layer 1 blockchain designed to support VISA's global commercial activity. [Source: VISA]
·usa.visa.com·
VISA Launches Stablecoin Settlement in the United States (VISA)