Fernando Navarrete, the rapporteur responsible for shepherding the digital euro legislation through the European Parliament, published his draft report for the Single Currency Package, which includes the Establishment of the Digital Euro Regulation, On October 28, 2025. The package included proposals for the establishment of the digital euro regulation, legal tender status regulation, and the provisions for payment service providers (PSPs) in non-euro member states regulation. [Source: European Parliament] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-778137_EN.pdf (legal tender status) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-778135_EN.pdf (PSPs in non-member countries)
Notably, the DRAFT legislation prioritizes the rollout of the offline versioN and mandates that the European Central Bank (ECB) complete all technical and organizational preparations for the offline digital euro before the online version is considered. Introduction of the online digital euro will depend on a market assessment by the European Commission, which will proceed only if there is no suitable pan-European private retail payment solution that covers person-to-person, point-of-sale, and e-commerce. Both forms, upon ECB authorization, enter a minimum 24-month adaptation phase to allow payment service providers and stakeholders to adjust securely and gradually. This framework aims to avoid crowding out private sector solutions, synchronize technical standards, and ensure interoperability, with clear fee guidelines and user choice, making public sector intervention conditional and proportional to actual market needs.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has completed the second and last phase of its e-HKD central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot program. It evaluated the commercial viability and scalability of an e-HKD in various retail scenarios and compared it with tokenized deposits, structured around three themes: (i) settlement of tokenised assets, (ii) programmability, and (iii) offline payments. The results showed that an e-HKD can deliver benefits such as cost-efficient, programmable, and resilient transactions. One of the key takeaways was that, for retail end users, including merchants, consumers and individual investors, the difference between an e-HKD and tokenized deposits is not immediately clear, particularly in the context of routine payment transactions. Hence, the HKMA concluded that the immediate priority for the e-HKD lies in wholesale payments, and going forward it will prioritize the development of the tokenization ecosystem and cross-border payments. [Source: HKMA]